Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Evans against Phillips, 1819 — 17 U.S. 73 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Evans against Phillips
17 U.S. 734 Wheat. 73·Supreme Court of the United States·1819
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Evans against Phillips.
(practice.)
A writ of error will not lie on a judgment of nonsuit.
Error to the Circuit Court of New-York.
Mr. D. B. Ogden moved to dismiss the Writ of error in this case,
upon the ground that the plaintiff had submitted to a nonsuit in the Court below, upórí which no writ of error will lie.
The Court directed the writ of error to be ¿dismissed.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment. This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record; on consideration whereof, it is adjudged and ordered, that the writ of error be, and the same is, hereby dismissed, with costs, the plaintiff having submitted to a nonsuit in the Circuit Court.
Vide Box v. Bennett, 1 H. Bl. 432. Kempland v. Macauley, 4 T. R. 436.