Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Pierre E. SYLVE, Plaintiff in Error, v. DELAWARE-LOUISIANA FUR-TRAPPING COMPANY, Inc., Defendant in Error, 1926 — 13 F.2d 74 · caselaw · US
General
Pierre E. SYLVE, Plaintiff in Error, v. DELAWARE-LOUISIANA FUR-TRAPPING COMPANY, Inc., Defendant in Error
13 F.2d 74·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1926
Before WALKER, BRYAN, and FOSTER, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Pierre E. SYLVE, Plaintiff in Error, v. DELAWARE-LOUISIANA FUR-TRAPPING COMPANY, Inc., Defendant in Error.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
May 18, 1926.)
No. 4724.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Louisiana; Louis H. Burns, Judge.
Eldon S. Lazarus, of New Orleans, La., for plaintiff in error.
Rene A. Viosea, of Hammond, La., for defendant in error.
Before WALKER, BRYAN, and FOSTER, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
This ease is so far like the case of Prejean v. Delaware-Louisiana Fur-Trapping Co., 13 F.(2d) 71, U. S. Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, present term, that the opinion in the latter shows the reason for the conclusion that the judgment in the above numbered and - entitled case should be reversed, and that said case be remanded for a new trial.
Reversed.