Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Oscar STIRMAN, alias Jack O. Stirman, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, 1931 — 53 F.2d 1084 · caselaw · US
General
Oscar STIRMAN, alias Jack O. Stirman, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
53 F.2d 1084·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1931
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Oscar STIRMAN, alias Jack O. Stirman, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 6251.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Dec. 14, 1931.
J. A. Lantz, of Wichita Falls, Tex., for appellant.
Norman A. Dodge, U. S. Atty., of Fort Worth, Tex.
Before BRYAN, SIBLEY, and HUTCHESON, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Whereas, on November 20, 1931, it was ordered that the appeal herein should abate unless within twenty days cause to the contrary were shown, and whereas twenty days have now elapsed since the issuance of said order and no cause has been shown why the appeal should not abate; it is ordered that the appeal in said cause is abated.