Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Nathaniel M. HUBBARD, Jr., Executor, etc., et al., Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, et al., 1929 — 35 F.2d 1018 · caselaw · US
General
Nathaniel M. HUBBARD, Jr., Executor, etc., et al., Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, et al.
35 F.2d 1018·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1929
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Nathaniel M. HUBBARD, Jr., Executor, etc., et al., Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, et al.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
June 10, 1929.
No. 8593.
George F. Henry and Phineas M. Henry, both of Des Moines, Iowa, for appellants.
Ray C. Fountain, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Des Moines, Iowa, for appellees.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Appeal dismissed without costs to either party in this court, on motion of appellants.