Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Alexander G. Calder, Appellant, v. Percy Jenkins, Respondent, 1892 — 133 N.Y. 616 · caselaw · US
General
Alexander G. Calder, Appellant, v. Percy Jenkins, Respondent
133 N.Y. 616·New York Court of Appeals·1892·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Alexander G. Calder, Appellant, v. Percy Jenkins, Respondent.
(Argued April 25, 1892;
decided May 3, 1892.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the General Term of the City Court of Brooklyn on the ground that the amouiit involved was less than $500.
Jesse Johnson for motion.
S. M. Meeker opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to dismiss appeal; no opinion.
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.