General
SCHOW v. HARRIMAN
154 U.S. 609·Supreme Court of the United States·1875
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
SCHOW v. HARRIMAN.
ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA.
No. 101.
Argued December 4, 7 and 8,1874.
Decided January 25, 1875.
Schulenberg v. llarriman, 21 Wall. 44, followed.
Mr. E. C. Palmer for plaintiff in error.
Mr. John C. Spooner, Mr. B. J. Stevens, Mr. P. L. Spooner and Mr. J. C. Sloan for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Mr. Justice Field]
Mr. Justice Field
delivered the opinion of the court.
This case depends upon the same principles for its disposition as the case of Schulenberg v. Harriman, just decided, 21 Wall. 44, and upon its authority the judgment is Affirmed.