Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
United States v. Thomas Tingey's Administrators, 1831 — 30 U.S. 131 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
United States v. Thomas Tingey's Administrators
30 U.S. 1315 Pet. 131·Supreme Court of the United States·1831
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
*United States v. Thomas Tingey’s Administrators.
Withdrawal of demurrer, after affirmance.
The court will not, on the motion of the plaintiff in error, instruct the circuit court to permit him to withdraw his demurrer, after an affirmance of the judgment of the circuit court; although this might have been done, had the judgment been reversed.
,Sioann, of counsel for the plaintiff in error in this cause,
moved the court to amend the judgment entered in this cause, by instructing the court below to permit him to withdraw his demurrer : On consideration whereof, this court is of opinion, that although this might have been done, upon a reversal, yet it cannot be done, where the judgment of the court has been affirmed, as this court cannot disaffirm its judgment.
[MAJORITY]
Whereupon, it is ordered by the court, that the said motion be and the same is hereby overruled.