Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Providence & Worcester Railroad Co., now Providence & Worcester Co. v. United States et al., 1969 — 396 U.S. 882 · caselaw · US
General
Providence & Worcester Railroad Co., now Providence & Worcester Co. v. United States et al.
396 U.S. 882·Supreme Court of the United States·1969
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
October 27, 1969
No. -.
Providence & Worcester Railroad Co., now Providence & Worcester Co. v. United States et al.
Harold I. Meyerson on the motion.
[MAJORITY]
D. C. S. D. N. Y. Motion of Providence & Worcester Railroad Co., now known as Providence & Worcester Co., for an extension of time to docket its appeal from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York entered on the 28th day of April 1969 granted, and the time for docketing said appeal extended to the date when appeals from the decree by said court dated September 11, 1969, are required to be docketed or, if no appeal is noted, until December 15, 1969.