Civil Procedure · MBE-tested
PITTSBURG, CINCINNATI, CHICAGO & ST. LOUIS RAILWAY COMPANY v. LIGHTHEISER; SAME v. COLLINS; SAME v. ROSS
212 U.S. 560·Supreme Court of the United States·1908
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
PITTSBURG, CINCINNATI, CHICAGO & ST. LOUIS RAILWAY COMPANY v. LIGHTHEISER. SAME v. COLLINS. SAME v. ROSS.
WRITS OF ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIANA.
Nos. 141, 142, 178.
Motions to dismiss or affirm, and for damages.
Submitted November 30, 1908.
Decided December 7, 1908.
Writs of error to review judgments of Supremo Court of State of Indiana, 168 Indiana, 438, 467, and 80 N. E. Rep. 845, in suits involving the constitutionality of the Employers’ Liability Act of that State dismissed for want of jurisdiction without opinion. Tullís v. Lake Erie & Western R. R. Co., 175 U. S. 348, followed.
Mr. Stewart T. McConnell, Mr. Albert G. Jenkines, Mr. Bertram C. Jenkines and Mr. Charles H. Stuart for defendants in error in support of the motions.
Mr. Allen Zollars and Mr. George E. Ross for plaintiff in error in opposition to the motions.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
Writs of error severally dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Tullis v. Lake Erie & Western R. R. Co., 175 U. S. 348, and cases cited; Pittsburg &c. Ry. Co. v. Lightheiser, 168 Indiana, 438; Same v. Collins, 168 Indiana, 467; and Same v. Ross, 80 N. E. Rep. 845.