Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People of the State of New York ex rel. Fanny A. Bull et al., Appellants, v. The City of Buffalo, Respondent, 1901 — 166 N.Y. 604 · caselaw · US
General
The People of the State of New York ex rel. Fanny A. Bull et al., Appellants, v. The City of Buffalo, Respondent
166 N.Y. 604·New York Court of Appeals·1901·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York ex rel. Fanny A. Bull et al., Appellants, v. The City of Buffalo, Respondent.
People ex rel. Bull v. City of Buffalo, 52 App. Div. 157, affirmed.
(Argued February 27, 1901;
decided March 19, 1901.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered June 8, 1900, affirming an order of Special Term dismissing a writ of certiorari and confirming an assessment for a local improvement in the city of Buffalo.
Henry Adsit Bull and Benjamin F. Folsom for appellants.
W. H. Cuddeback for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Martin, Vann and Landon, JJ. Not voting : Haight, J.