Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Lehnhausen, Director, Department of Local Government Affairs of Illinois v. Lake Shore Auto Parts Co. et al. ; and Barrett, County Clerk of Cook County, Illinois, et al. v. Shapiro et al., 1972 — 406 U.S. 942 · caselaw · US
General
Lehnhausen, Director, Department of Local Government Affairs of Illinois v. Lake Shore Auto Parts Co. et al. ; and Barrett, County Clerk of Cook County, Illinois, et al. v. Shapiro et al.
406 U.S. 942·Supreme Court of the United States·1972
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 71-685.
No. 71-691.
Lehnhausen, Director, Department of Local Government Affairs of Illinois v. Lake Shore Auto Parts Co. et al. ; and Barrett, County Clerk of Cook County, Illinois, et al. v. Shapiro et al.
[MAJORITY]
Sup. Ct. Ill. [Certiorari granted, 405 U. S. 1039.] Motion of Lake Shore Auto Parts Co. for leave to withdraw as a party respondent in No. 71-685 denied. Motion for order requiring petitioners to recognize “Maynard Respondents” as parties to the litigation denied without prejudice to seeking leave to appear as amici curiae.