General
Denicke et al. v. Anglo California National Bank et al.; Denicke v. Brigham et al.; and Doble v. Buck et al.
323 U.S. 739·Supreme Court of the United States·1944
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 155.
No. 196.
No. 197.
Denicke et al. v. Anglo California National Bank et al.; Denicke v. Brigham et al.; and Doble v. Buck et al.
October 9, 1944.
Messrs. Allen L. Chickering, Walter C. Fox, Jr., and Vincent I. Compagno for Anglo California National Bank, and Messrs. Maurice E. Harrison and Theo. J. Roche for Fleishhacker et al., respondents in No. 155.
Messrs. Theo. J. Roche, Hiram W. Johnson, Theodore H. Roche, and James Farraher for. Fleishhacker et al., and Mr. Robert M. Searls for Humphrey, respondents in Nos. 196 and 197.
[MAJORITY]
Petitions for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied. Mr. Aaron M. Sargent for petitioners.