Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY, et al., 2017 — 137 S. Ct. 1395 · caselaw · US
General
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY, et al.
137 S. Ct. 1395197 L. Ed. 2d 552·Supreme Court of the United States·2017
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, petitioner,
v.
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY, et al.
No. 16-466.
Supreme Court of the United States
March 27, 2017.
Motion of TV Azteca, S.A.B. de C.V., et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae out of time granted.