Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Paul Halpin, Appellant, v. The Mutual Brewing Company et al., Respondents, 1896 — 148 N.Y. 744 · caselaw · US
General
Paul Halpin, Appellant, v. The Mutual Brewing Company et al., Respondents
148 N.Y. 744·New York Court of Appeals·1896·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Paul Halpin, Appellant, v. The Mutual Brewing Company et al., Respondents.
Reported below, 91 Hun, 220.
(Submitted January 20, 1896;
decided January 31, 1896.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, made December 4, 1895, which,affirmed an order of Special Term permitting the receiver of the Mutual Brewing Company defendant to pay out funds to certain persons named.
Dwrnin da Yates for appellant.
G. J. G. Hall for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal dismissed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.