Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
L. Bradford Prince, Respondent, v. William C. Conner, Appellant, 1877 — 69 N.Y. 608 · caselaw · US
General
L. Bradford Prince, Respondent, v. William C. Conner, Appellant
69 N.Y. 608·New York Court of Appeals·1877·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
L. Bradford Prince, Respondent, v. William C. Conner, Appellant.
The proper measure of damages in an action for the conversion of chattels is the value of the property at the time of the conversón with interest to the time of the trial.
(Argued March 20, 1877;
decided March 27, 1877.)
This was an action to recover damages for the alleged unlawful taking and conversion by defendant of certain goods and chattels the property of plaintiff.
The court charged upon the subject of damages in substance, that if plaintiff was entitled to recover, the jury might allow the market value of the property at the time of the conversion, the damages sustained by plaintiff by reason of the taking and interest on the value; defendant’s counsel excepted to “ that part of the charge which says that the jury are entitled to render a verdict for any damages other than the value of the property and- interest.” Held, that the charge was erroneous in this respect and the exception well taken.
Almon Goodwin, for appellant.
M. Lyman and L. Bradford Prince, respondent in person.
[MAJORITY — Allen, J.,]
Allen, J.,
reads for reversal and new trial.
All concur.
Judgment reversed.