Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Koppers Company, Inc., et al. v. United States, 1962 — 371 U.S. 856 · caselaw · US
General
Koppers Company, Inc., et al. v. United States
371 U.S. 856·Supreme Court of the United States·1962
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
October 13, 1962.
No. 102.
Koppers Company, Inc., et al. v. United States.
John M. Crimmins, Templeton Smith and Robert L. Kirkpatrick for appellants.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Robert B. Hummel and William H. McManus for the United States.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. Dismissed pursuant to Rule 60 of the Rules of this Court.