Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Seaboard & Western Airlines, Inc., v. Civil Aeronautics Board et al.; and Civil Aeronautics Board v. Pan American World Airways, Inc., et al., 1959 — 359 U.S. 912 · caselaw · US
General
Seaboard & Western Airlines, Inc., v. Civil Aeronautics Board et al.; and Civil Aeronautics Board v. Pan American World Airways, Inc., et al.
359 U.S. 912·Supreme Court of the United States·1959
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 639.
No. 645.
Seaboard & Western Airlines, Inc., v. Civil Aeronautics Board et al.; and Civil Aeronautics Board v. Pan American World Airways, Inc., et al.
Hardy K. Maclay and Walter D. Hansen for petitioner in No. 639.
Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Hansen, Franklin M. Stone and O. D. Ozment for petitioner in No. 645.
Henry J. Friendly for Pan American World Airways, Inc., and Charles Pickett and William Caverly for Trans. World • Airlines, ínc., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.
Reported below: 104 U. S. App. D. C. 288, 261 F. 2d 754..