General
Bloomington Mining Company, Respondent, v. Brooklyn Hygienic Ice Company, Appellant
171 N.Y. 673·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Bloomington Mining Company, Respondent, v. Brooklyn Hygienic Ice Company, Appellant.
Bloomington Mining Co. v. Brooklyn H. Ice Co., 58 App. Div. 66, affirmed.
(Argued May 28, 1902;
decided June 10, 1902.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 26, 1901, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
L. Laflin Kellogg and Alfred G. Petté for appellant.
Franklin D. Peale for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Martin, Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ.