Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Application of The Buffalo Traction Company, Respondent, for the Appointment of Commissioners to Determine, etc.; Emma K. White et al., Appellants, 1898 — 155 N.Y. 700 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Application of The Buffalo Traction Company, Respondent, for the Appointment of Commissioners to Determine, etc.; Emma K. White et al., Appellants
155 N.Y. 700·New York Court of Appeals·1898·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of The Buffalo Traction Company, Respondent, for the Appointment of Commissioners to Determine, etc.; Emma K. White et al., Appellants.
Matter of Buffalo Traction Go., 35 App. Div. 447, affirmed.
(Argued April 19, 1898;
decided May 3, 1898.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered February 23, 1898, confirming the report of commissioners determining that a proposed street surface railroad should be constructed and operated.
Eugene M. Bartlett for appellants.
J. H. Metcalf for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
All concur.