Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The West Side Railroad Company of Elmira, New York, Respondent, v. The New York, Lake Erie and Western Railroad Company, Appellant, 1894 — 141 N.Y. 549 · caselaw · US
Civil Procedure · MBE-tested
The West Side Railroad Company of Elmira, New York, Respondent, v. The New York, Lake Erie and Western Railroad Company, Appellant
141 N.Y. 549·New York Court of Appeals·1894·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The West Side Railroad Company of Elmira, New York, Respondent, v. The New York, Lake Erie and Western Railroad Company, Appellant.
(Argued December 11, 1893 ;
decided January 16, 1894.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, made September 12, 1893, which reversed an order of Special Term denying an application by plaintiff to intersect the tracks of defendant.
JD. O. Líolñnson for appellant.
Frederick Collin for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur, except Bartlett, J., not sitting.
Order affirmed.