Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People ex rel. James Eckerson et al., Respondents, v. Edward W. Christie et al., Appellants, 1889 — 115 N.Y. 644 · caselaw · US
General
The People ex rel. James Eckerson et al., Respondents, v. Edward W. Christie et al., Appellants
115 N.Y. 644·New York Court of Appeals·1889·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People ex rel. James Eckerson et al., Respondents, v. Edward W. Christie et al., Appellants.
(Argued June 4, 1889;
decided June 18, 1889.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered upon an order made March 13, 1888, which modified • and, as modified, affirmed a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, entered upon the decision of the court on trial at Special Term, which was brought up for review by certiorari.
Irving Brown for appellants.
Calvin Frost for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.