Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
M'Iver and others v. Wattles, 1824 — 22 U.S. 650 · caselaw · US
General
M'Iver and others v. Wattles
22 U.S. 6509 Wheat. 650·Supreme Court of the United States·1824
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
[PRACTICE.]
M'Iver and others v. Wattles.
Where, the writ of error, is. dismissed, for. want of jurisdiction, no •costs are allowed.
ERROR to the Circuit Court for the District of Columbia.
Feb. 13th.
Upon inspection of the record, it appeared that the sum in controversy was below one thousand dollars, and,- thereupon, the Court directed-the writ of error to be dismissed.
Mr. Taylor, for the defendant in error,
moved for costs.
[MAJORITY — Mr. Chief Justice Marshall]
Mr. Chief Justice Marshall
said, that ill all cases where the cause is dismissed for want of jurisdiction, no costs are allowed.
Motion denied.