Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Raymond Christman, Respondent, v. John W. Thatcher, as Overseer of the Poor of the Town of Amsterdam et al., Appellants, 1889 — 113 N.Y. 625 · caselaw · US
General
Raymond Christman, Respondent, v. John W. Thatcher, as Overseer of the Poor of the Town of Amsterdam et al., Appellants
113 N.Y. 625·New York Court of Appeals·1889·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Raymond Christman, Respondent, v. John W. Thatcher, as Overseer of the Poor of the Town of Amsterdam et al., Appellants.
(Argued March 5, 1889;
decided March 19, 1889.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, made May 1, 1888, which reversed an order of Special Term allowing the town of Amsterdam to intervene in an action brought by plaintiff against Thatcher, as overseer of said town.
Nathaniel C. Moak for appellants.
E. P. White for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to dismiss appeal; no opinion.
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.