Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Gray, Chairman of the Georgia State Democratic Executive Committee, et al. v. Sanders, 1962 — 370 U.S. 921 · caselaw · US
General
Gray, Chairman of the Georgia State Democratic Executive Committee, et al. v. Sanders
370 U.S. 921·Supreme Court of the United States·1962
Mr. Justice Harlan would note probable jurisdiction and deny the motion to advance, with leave to the appellants to apply to this Court for a stay of the injunction order of the District Court pending determination of this appeal.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 959.
Gray, Chairman of the Georgia State Democratic Executive Committee, et al. v. Sanders.
Eugene Cook, Attorney General of Georgia, B. D. Murphy and E. Freeman Leverett, Deputy Assistant Attorneys General, and Lamar W. Sizemore for appellants. Herman Heyman, Morris B. Abram and Robert E. Hicks for appellee.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. Probable jurisdiction noted. Motion to advance denied.
Mr. Justice Harlan would note probable jurisdiction and deny the motion to advance, with leave to the appellants to apply to this Court for a stay of the injunction order of the District Court pending determination of this appeal.