Skip to main content

Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.

L. F. v. Cuyahoga County Department of Children and Family Services; Cox v. Howerton, Warden; Starr v. United States; Florimonte v. Borough of Dalton, Pennsylvania; Honarmand v. J. C. Penney; Smith v. Monroe et al.; Mizukami v. Edwards et al.; Swisher v. Levenhagen, Superintendent, Westville Correctional Facility; McKinney v. Sheets, Warden; Gather v. Oklahoma Army National Guard et al.; Benson v. Luttrell, Sheriff, Shelby County, Tennessee, et al.; Davenport v. McLaughlin, Warden; Trammell v. Smart et al.; Sadlowski v. Town of Middlefield; Johnson v. Hendrick Automotive Group et al.; Morris v. Cross et al.; Boles v. Newth et al.; Williams v. Danforth, Warden; Adetiloye v. United States; Ashford v. Wenerowicz, Warden, et al. In re Swisher. Dickinson v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, et al., 2013 — 568 U.S. 1139 · caselaw · US