Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Edward P. Bates, Respondent, v. Fish Brothers Wagon Company, Appellant, 1901 — 169 N.Y. 587 · caselaw · US
General
Edward P. Bates, Respondent, v. Fish Brothers Wagon Company, Appellant
169 N.Y. 587·New York Court of Appeals·1901·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Edward P. Bates, Respondent, v. Fish Brothers Wagon Company, Appellant.
Bates v. Fish Brothers Wagon Co., 50 App. Div. 38, affirmed.
(Argued December 9, 1901;
decided December 31, 1901.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered March 28, 1900, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee.
Thomas M. Kearney and I). A. Pierce for appellant.
Franh Hiscoch for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Oh. J., Gray, O’Brien, Haight, Landon, Cullen and Werner, JJ.