Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Bank of Clarke County, Respondent, v. Theodore Gilman et al., Appellants, 1897 — 152 N.Y. 634 · caselaw · US
General
Bank of Clarke County, Respondent, v. Theodore Gilman et al., Appellants
152 N.Y. 634·New York Court of Appeals·1897·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Bank of Clarke County, Respondent, v. Theodore Gilman et al., Appellants.
Bank of Clarke Co. v. Gilman, 81 Hun, 486, affirmed.
(Argued March 2, 1897;
decided March 16, 1897.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Genera] Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department in favor of plaintiff, entered November 22,1894, upon the submission of an agreed case under section 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
H. B. Closson for appellants.
Charles A. Boston for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed on opinion below, with costs.
All concur, except Gray, J., absent.