General
Kramer v. Ohio
320 U.S. 711·Supreme Court of the United States·1943
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 412.
Kramer v. Ohio.
November 8, 1943.
Mr. William J. Corrigan for appellant-petitioner. Mr. Frank T. Culli-tan for appellee-respondent.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The motion for leave to file statement as to jurisdiction is granted. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. McNaughton v. Johnson, 242 U. S. 344, 348-9; Graves v. Minnesota, 272 U. S. 425, 428; Roschen v. Ward, 279 U. S. 337, 339-40; Semler v. Board of Dental Examiners, 294 U. S. 608, 611. The petition for writ of certiorari is denied.