General
W. F. Baird, Administrator, etc., Plaintiff in Error, v. J. D. Monroe et al.
207 U.S. 580·Supreme Court of the United States·1907
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 306.
W. F. Baird, Administrator, etc., Plaintiff in Error, v. J. D. Monroe et al.
In error to the Supremo Court of the State of California.
Motions to dismiss or affirm submitted October 21, 1907.
Decided October 28, 1907.
Mr. Rufus H. Thayer for plaintiff in error. Mr. John M. York for defendants in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Oxley Stave Company v. Butler County, 166 U. S. 648; Hulbert v. Chicago, 202 U. S. 275; Miller v. Cornwall Railroad Company, 168 U. S. 134; Mutual Life Insurance Company v. McGrew, 188 U. S. 291; Howard v. Fleming, 191 U. S. 126; New Orleans Waterworks Company v. Louisiana, 185 U. S. 336.