Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
KERR STEAMSHIP CO., INC., et al. v. UNITED STATES et al., 1962 — 369 U.S. 422 · caselaw · US
General
KERR STEAMSHIP CO., INC., et al. v. UNITED STATES et al.
369 U.S. 422·Supreme Court of the United States·1962
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
KERR STEAMSHIP CO., INC., et al. v. UNITED STATES et al.
No. 29.
Decided April 9, 1962.
Herman Goldman, Elkan Turk and Elkan Turk, Jr. for petitioners.
Solicitor General Cox and Robert E. Mitchell for respondents.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Upon the respondents’ suggestion of mootness, the petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated. The case is remanded to that court with instructions to dismiss the petition for review as moot.