General
Edward Butcher, Jr., Appellant, v. Frederick S. Pearson, Respondent, Impleaded with Others
161 N.Y. 625·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Edward Butcher, Jr., Appellant, v. Frederick S. Pearson, Respondent, Impleaded with Others.
Butcher v. Pearson, 43 App. Div. 468, affirmed.
(Argued November 21, 1899;
decided December 5, 1899.)
Appeal, by permission, from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered October 25, 1899, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant Pearson, entered upon a decision of the court sustaining a demurrer to the complaint on trial at Special Term.
The question certified was : “ Does the complaint state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against the defendant Pearson ? ” ■
E. F. Bullard and Waldo E. Bullard for appellant.
Howard A. Taylor and Origen S. Seymour for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, and the question certified answered in the negative ; no opinion.
All concur.