Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Henry Beste et al., Appellants v. Henry S. Burger et al., Respondents, 1888 — 110 N.Y. 644 · caselaw · US
General
Henry Beste et al., Appellants v. Henry S. Burger et al., Respondents
110 N.Y. 644·New York Court of Appeals·1888·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Henry Beste et al., Appellants v. Henry S. Burger et al., Respondents.
(Submitted June 18, 1888;
decided June 29, 1888.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Court of Common Pleas in and for the city and county of New York, entered upon an order made December 7,1885, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendants, entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
This action was brought by judgment-creditors of a firm to set aside an assignment made by surviving members of the firm for the benefit of creditors.
The contention of plaintiffs was that the surviving members, had no right to make the assignment. ■ Held otherwise on authority of Williams v. Whedon (109 N. Y. 333).
Plaintiff sought to prove declarations of the assignors after the assignment, this was objected to as incompetent against the assignee; after this objection the offer was persisted in by plaintiffs without any suggestion that the evidence was competent as against the parties making the declarations. The objection was sustained. Held, no error, that as the evidence was offered against all the defendants it was properly excluded.
Coudert Brothers for appellants.
W. W. MacFarland for respondents.
Earl, J., reads for affirmance.
[MAJORITY]
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.