Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People of the State of New York ex rel. Frank Acritelli et al., Composing the Firm of F. Acritelli & Son, Respondents, v. Edward M. Grout, as Comptroller of the City of New York, Appellant, 1904 — 177 N.Y. 587 · caselaw · US
Criminal Law · MBE-tested
The People of the State of New York ex rel. Frank Acritelli et al., Composing the Firm of F. Acritelli & Son, Respondents, v. Edward M. Grout, as Comptroller of the City of New York, Appellant
177 N.Y. 587·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York ex rel. Frank Acritelli et al., Composing the Firm of F. Acritelli & Son, Respondents, v. Edward M. Grout, as Comptroller of the City of New York, Appellant.
People ex rel. Aoritelli v. Grout, 87 App. Div. 193, affirmed.
(Argued February 10, 1904;
decided March 1, 1904.)
■ Appeal from an order- of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered October 29, 1903, which affirmed an order of Special Term granting a motion for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel defendant to pay to relator an amount awarded to an attorney for his services on the trial of an indictment for murder, and duly assigned by him to such relator.
John J. Dela/tvy, Corporation Counsel (Theodore Connol/y of counsel), for appellant.
Ccesar B. F. Boma for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs, on prevailing opinion below.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Haight, Martin, Vann and Cullen, JJ.