General

Louise Gottschalk, Respondent, v. Julius Jungmann, Appellant, Impleaded with Others; Same, Respondent, v. Same, Appellant

181 N.Y. 542·New York Court of Appeals·1905·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Louise Gottschalk, Respondent, v. Julius Jungmann, Appellant, Impleaded with Others. Same, Respondent, v. Same, Appellant. Gottschalk v. Jungmann, 91 App. Div. 012, affirmed. (Argued March 13, 1905; decided April 11, 1905.) Appeals from judgments of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 1, 1904, modifying and affirming as 'modified judgments in favor of plaintiff entered upon decisions of the court on trial at Special Term. Joseph Fettretoh for appellant. Charles H. Collins for respondent. [MAJORITY] Judgments affirmed, with costs; no opinion. ■ Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Vann and Werner, JJ.