Contracts · MBE-tested
PENNSYLVANIA CEMENT COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. BRADLEY CONTRACTING COMPANY, Defendant, and Ernest C. Moore, Appellant
6 F.2d 1022·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1925
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
PENNSYLVANIA CEMENT COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. BRADLEY CONTRACTING COMPANY, Defendant, and Ernest C. Moore, Appellant.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
March 20, 1925.)
No. 8.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
Wood, Cooke & Seitz, of New York City (Howard O. Wood, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant. Leo Oppenheimer, of New York City, for defendant appellee.
Before ROGERS, MANTON, and HAND, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Order affirmed. A rearguiment of this ease was granted, and at its conclusion the order was again affirmed.