Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Stacy et al. v. Mahan et al., 1975 — 421 U.S. 956 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Stacy et al. v. Mahan et al.
421 U.S. 956·United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania·1975
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
May 12, 1975
No. 74-912.
Stacy et al. v. Mahan et al.
Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of cases in which orders hereinafter reported were announced on this date, with the exception of the following:
No. 74-912, Stacy v. Mahan, infra, this page; No. 74-932, Lekometros v. United States, infra, p. 962; No. 74-955, Art Theater Guild, Inc. v. Ohio ex rel. Schoen, infra, p. 957; No. 74-956, Art Theater Guild, Inc. v. Ohio ex rel. Anderson, infra, p. 957; No. 74-984, Maver v. Loesch, infra, p. 962; No. 74-989, United States Clay Producers Traffic Assn., Inc. v. Central of Georgia R. Co., infra, p. 957; No. 74-1021, Rosselli v. United States, infra, p. 962; No. 74—1029, Chicago & Eastern Illinois R. Co. v. United States, infra, this page; No. 74-1033, Dann v. Johnston, infra, p. 962; No. 74r-1035, Stitt v. United States, infra, p. 962; No. 74-1084, Anderson v. Langenwalter, infra, p. 962; No. 74-1093, Riley v. Estate of Riley, infra, p. 971; No. 74—1095, Denton v. United States, infra, p. 963; No. 74-1102, National Maritime Union of America, AFL-CIO v. National Labor Relations Board, infra, p. 963; No. 74-1125, Bernstein v. United States, infra, p. 962; No. 74-1131, Kalamazoo Board of Education v. Oliver, infra, p. 963; No. 74-1132, Michigan State Board of Education v. Oliver, infra, p. 963; No. 74-1148, Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., Inc. v. Cottrell, infra, p. 961; No. 74-1158, Smart v. Texas Power & Light Co., infra, p. 958; No. 74-1188, Kerrigan v. Morgan, infra, p. 963; No. 74-1190, White v. Morgan, infra, p. 963; No. 74-1196, Kline v. Coldwell, Banker & Co., infra, p. 963; No. 74-1197, White v. McIntosh, infra, p. 957; No. 74-1199, Brown v. Wood, infra, p. 963; No. 74-1210, Sadlak v. Gilligan, infra, this page; and No. 74-6227, John v. United States, infra, p. 962.
[MAJORITY]
Affirmed on appeal from D. C. E. D. Va.