General
Marvich v. California et al.
320 U.S. 712·Supreme Court of the United States·1943
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 60.
Marvich v. California et al.
November 15, 1943.
Mr. Neil Burkinshaw for petitioner. Messrs. Robert W. Kenny, Attorney General of California, and Eugene M. Elson, Deputy Attorney General, for respondents.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The'motion of respondent to remand is granted, the judgment is vacated and the cause is remanded to . the Supreme Court of California for further proceedings.