General
Noe et al., doing business as James A. Noe & Co., v. Federal Communications Commission et al
359 U.S. 924·Supreme Court of the United States·1959
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 643.
Noe et al., doing business as James A. Noe & Co., v. Federal Communications Commission et al.
Warren Woods for petitioner.
Solicitor■ General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Hansen, John L. Fitzgerald and Richard A. Solomon■ for the Federal Communications Commission, and Paul'M. Segal and Robert A. Marmet for Loyola' University, respondents.
[MAJORITY]
United States Court of Appeals for. the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.