Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
CHICAGO & NORTHWESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant, v. O. N. LINDELL, Appellee, 1930 — 39 F.2d 1021 · caselaw · US
Corporations
CHICAGO & NORTHWESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant, v. O. N. LINDELL, Appellee
39 F.2d 1021·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1930
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
CHICAGO & NORTHWESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant, v. O. N. LINDELL, Appellee.
No. 5778.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
May 12, 1930.
Aaron M. Sargent, of San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.
Frank Kauke, of Fresno, Cal., for appellee.
Before RUDKIN, DIETRICH, and WILBUR, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Judgment affirmed on authority of Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. O. N. Lindell, 281 U. S. 14, 50 S. Ct. 200, 74 L. Ed.-, decided by the Supreme Court February 24, 1930.