Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Dixie Carriers, Inc. et al. v. United States et al., 1955 — 350 U.S. 814 · caselaw · US
General
Dixie Carriers, Inc. et al. v. United States et al.
350 U.S. 814·Supreme Court of the United States·1955
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 233.
Dixie Carriers, Inc. et al. v. United States et al.
Donald Macleay for the Dixie Carriers, Inc. et al., and Nuel D. Belnap for the Federal Barge Line, Inc. et al., appellants. Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Barnes and Daniel M. Friedman for the United States, Samuel R. Howell for the Interstate Commerce Commission, and John A. Daily for the New York Central Railroad Co. et al., appellees.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas. Probable jurisdiction noted.