Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Rosario et al. v. Rockefeller, Governor of New York, et al., 1972 — 406 U.S. 957 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Rosario et al. v. Rockefeller, Governor of New York, et al.
406 U.S. 957·Supreme Court of the United States·1972
Mr. Justice Stewart would expedite consideration on the merits. Application for stay, presented to Mr. Justice Marshall, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Mr. Justice Douglas, Mr. Justice Brennan, Mr. Justice Stewart, and Mr. Justice Marshall would grant the stay.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 71-1371.
Rosario et al. v. Rockefeller, Governor of New York, et al.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 2d Cir. Motion of Lawyers for McGovern for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Certiorari granted. Motion for summary reversal or, in the alternative, for expedited consideration on the merits denied.
Mr. Justice Stewart would expedite consideration on the merits. Application for stay, presented to Mr. Justice Marshall, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Mr. Justice Douglas, Mr. Justice Brennan, Mr. Justice Stewart, and Mr. Justice Marshall would grant the stay.