Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
WESTERN AIR LINE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. McGILLIS, 1888 — 127 U.S. 776 · caselaw · US
General
WESTERN AIR LINE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. McGILLIS
127 U.S. 77632 L. Ed. 324·Supreme Court of the United States·1888
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
WESTERN AIR LINE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. McGILLIS.
ORIGINAL MOTION IN A CAUSE BROUGHT HERE BY WRIT OF ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 1283.
Submitted April 9, 1888.
—Decided April 16, 1888.
The court, for reasons stated in its opinion, denies a motion to vacate a supersedeas orto make an order that the'appeal bond filed in the case does not operate as a supersedeas.
The defendants in error made the following motion:
“ And now come the defendants in error in the above cause, by John S. Cooper, their attorney and counsel, and move the
court to vacate the supersedeas in the above cause, or for an order declaring that the appeal bond filed by appellant in said cause does not operate as a supersedeas; because the writ of error was not sued out or served within sixty days after the rendering of the judgment entered and complained of in said cause.
“John S. Cooper,
“ Attorney and Cowisel for Defendants in Error.”
Mr. John 8. Cooper for the motion.
Mr. E. Walker opposing.
[MAJORITY — Mr. Justice Miller:]
Mr. Justice Miller:
This is a motion to vacate what is called a supersedeas. The papers show that the writ ivas neither sued out or served within sixty days after the rendition of the judgment which is the subject of the writ of error: It follows as a matter of course that the writ cannot operate as a supersedeas, and we know of no motion that is necessary or proper in this court on that subject. Writs of supersedeas do not issue, unless it may become necessary from some peculiar circumstances. • The statute declares .that, when within sixty days, the plaintiff sues out his writ of error, files it with the clerk of the proper court, and then gives a bond within a certain time mentioned by the statute, that the bond, if approved for that purpose by the judge who grants the citation and the writ of error, shall operate as a supersedeas. It is a matter of law whether it operates as a supersedeas.
There is no evidence here of any proceeding to collect a debt which has been disregarded. At all events there is no occasion for a supersedeas.
The motion is denied.