General
James Brown, Respondent, v. The Rome, Watertown and Ogdensburg Railroad Company, Appellant
121 N.Y. 669·New York Court of Appeals·1890·NY
All concur.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
James Brown, Respondent, v. The Rome, Watertown and Ogdensburg Railroad Company, Appellant.
(Argued April 18, 1890 ;
decided May 6, 1890.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered upon an order made Hay 3, 1888, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial.
WilUam B. Pornilower for appellant.
Daniel Magone for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.