Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
George S. Conant, Appellant, v. George A. Wright and Eugene F. Seymour et al., Executors of Gegrge De V. Seymour, Deceased, Respondents, 1900 — 162 N.Y. 635 · caselaw · US
General
George S. Conant, Appellant, v. George A. Wright and Eugene F. Seymour et al., Executors of Gegrge De V. Seymour, Deceased, Respondents
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
George S. Conant, Appellant, v. George A. Wright and Eugene F. Seymour et al., Executors of Gegrge De V. Seymour, Deceased, Respondents.
Conant v. Wright, 33-App. Div. 316. affirmed,
(Argued March 16, 1900;
decided April 6, 1900.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered November 26, 1897, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
Eustace Conway and Charles R. Westbrook for appellant.
R. E. Waterman and Eugene F. Seymour for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, Bartlett, Martin, Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ.