Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
James H. Brady, Appellant, v. Nathan Hutkoff, Respondent, 1898 — 155 N.Y. 681 · caselaw · US
General
James H. Brady, Appellant, v. Nathan Hutkoff, Respondent
155 N.Y. 681·New York Court of Appeals·1898·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
James H. Brady, Appellant, v. Nathan Hutkoff, Respondent.
Brady v. Hutlcoff, 13 Mise. Rep. 515, affirmed.
(Submitted March 15, 1898;
decided April 19, 1898.)
Appeal from a judgment of the General Term of the late Superior Court of the city of New York, entered July 8, 1895, upon an order affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon the report of a referee.
G. N. Boyee, Jr., and J. MeG. Goodale for appellant.
Dmid lewntiritt for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
All concur.