Civil Procedure · MBE-tested
People of the State of Illinois on the Relation of George F. Rayburn et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Hugh A. Binns et al.
189 U.S. 506·Supreme Court of the United States·1903
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 208.
People of the State of Illinois on the Relation of George F. Rayburn et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Hugh A. Binns et al.
Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Illinois.
Submitted March 12, 1903.
Decided March 16, 1903.
Mr. Edward D. Blinn for plaintiffs in error.
No appearance for defendants in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction on the authority of Castillo v. McConnico, 168 U. S. 674; Butler v. Gage, 138 U. S. 52; Erie Railroad Company v. Purdy, 185 U. S. 148. See 192 Illinois, 68.