Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The Bank of N. A. versus M'Knight, 1792 — 2 U.S. 158 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
The Bank of N. A. versus M'Knight
2 U.S. 1582 Dall. 158·Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·1792·PA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Bank of N. A. versus M'Knight.
THE defendant was sued, as indorsor of a promissory note, drawn by S. Sidman, on the 10th February, 1785, payable in. forty-five days. Notice was given to Sidman on the day it became due, and to M‘Knight four or five days after; which the defendant now contended was too late.
[MAJORITY — M‘Kean, Chief Justice,]
By
M‘Kean, Chief Justice,
(the other Judges declining to give any opinion on account of their interest in the Bank). Before the revolution, it was not usual to give notice to the indorsor, or even to call on the drawer, as soon as a note became due; it would have been considered as harsh and unreasonable. But since the establishment of the bank, a rule has been introduced ; and as these notes, lodged in the bank, were often accommodation notes, it was highly reasonable that notice should be given in a short time. What that time ought to be has not been determined. Two or three months would certainly be too long, and a day may be too short. I would singly law down a rule, but leave it to the Jury as a question of fact. They must therefore judge for themselves, taking into consideration the usual practice at that time.
Verdict for the Plaintiff.
See 1 Dall. Rep. 252.