Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
L. C. DILKS v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, 1934 — 69 F.2d 1002 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
L. C. DILKS v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
69 F.2d 1002·United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·1934
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
L. C. DILKS v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.
No. 4898.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
Jan. 30, 1934.
Donald Horne, of New York City, for petitioner.
J. P. Jackson, of Washington, D. C., for respondent.
Before EVANS, SPARKS, and FITZ-HENRY, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Now this day come the parties by their counsel, and this cause now comes on to be heard on the printed record and briefs of counsel, and on oral arguments. On consideration whereof, it is now here ordered and adjudged by this court that the decision entered in this cause on June 7, 1929, by the United States Board of Tax Appeals, be, and tbe same is hereby, affirmed.