General
Hotard et al. v. New Orleans et al.
335 U.S. 803·Supreme Court of the United States·1948
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 259.
Hotard et al. v. New Orleans et al.
Lester P. Schoene for appellants.
Henry B. Curtis, David M. Wood, R. E. Milling, Jr., Harry McCall, Leonard B. Levy, J. Blanc Monroe, Walter J. Suthon, Jr., Arthur A. Moreno and James U. Ogden for appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The motion for leave to file supplemental statement opposing jurisdiction, motion to dismiss or affirm and motion for damages are granted. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.