Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Alexander McAndrew, Respondent, v. The Lake Shore and Michigan Southern Railway Company, Appellant, 1895 — 146 N.Y. 377 · caselaw · US
General
Alexander McAndrew, Respondent, v. The Lake Shore and Michigan Southern Railway Company, Appellant
146 N.Y. 377·New York Court of Appeals·1895·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Alexander McAndrew, Respondent, v. The Lake Shore and Michigan Southern Railway Company, Appellant.
(Submitted April 32, 1895;
decided May 3, 1895.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, made June 23, 1893, which, affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion by defendant for leave to serve a supplemental answer.
Charles A. Pooley for appellant.
Geo. E. Towne for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to dismiss appeal on authority of Farmer's L. & T. Co. v. Bankers & Merchants' Tel. Co. (109 N. Y. 342); no opinion. All concur, except Haight, J., not sitting.
Appeal dismissed.